I don’t know how this book managed to avoid my radar for all this time. After all, I am a big fan of the surrealistic fantasies of Jorge Luis Borges. In fact, Invisible Cities reminds me of some of the more abstract pieces by Borges than those of any other writer. It is labeled as a novel, but it is not really a novel, at least not in the conventional sense of the term. It consists of a series of dialogs between Kublai Khan and Marco Polo about cities that may or may not exist in Khan’s realm. Polo’s descriptions of the cities are seldom realistic. Instead, after Polo delineates the main attributes of each city, he then presents details that call into question the city’s reality, or makes the city seem to be the opposite of the reader’s initial impression, or hints at all but indiscernible hidden depths that can be glimpsed but not explored. Whether the cities actually exist or not appears to be less important than the conclusions Kublai Khan draws from the descriptions.
As I said, this work reminds me of Borges. However, the best of Borges’s work, despite its slippages into the surreal, always has characters that anchor the story in humankind, while Invisible Cities seems content to remain in abstraction. While reading this I was also reminded of “Kubla Khan” by Samuel Taylor Coleridge, one of my favorite poems, which beautifully captures the elegance and majestic drama of Khan’s empire.
In the book, Marco Polo is Khan’s employee, his ambassador, but the two seem to have a very special relationship. Khan craves Polo’s stories, almost as if he requires them for self-justification. Although Khan and Polo are the only two characters, each city is presented as unique, with a personality of its own; the vignettes describe the cities almost as if they were human characters, each one starkly different from the last, and each one idiosyncratic to the extreme.
One peculiarity, and an indication that Calvino does not intend for the thirteenth century historical setting to be taken seriously, is that the descriptions of the cities often contain modern props such as postcards, skyscrapers, steamboats, radio antennae, and so on, and these insertions are not explained or questioned; it is as if Khan and Polo have access to the whole of history as they carry on their intellectual exchange. And at one point Khan mentions that there is one city that Polo never speaks of: his native city, Venice. To which Polo replies, “Every time I say something about a city I am saying something about Venice.”
The cities are grouped into categories such as “Cities and Memory,” “Cities and Desire,” “Cities and Signs,” “Trading Cities,” “Cities and the Dead,” and so on. One city called Adelma (the cities all have women’s names) appears to be populated with dead people, and by the end of his vignette Polo questions whether he himself is in fact alive or dead. He observes that “you reach a moment in life when, among the people you have known, the dead outnumber the living. And the mind refuses to accept more faces, more expressions; on every new face you encounter, it prints the old forms, for each one it finds the most suitable mask.” The book is full of such profundities.
Overall, Invisible Cities left me mystified, but that’s not necessarily a bad thing. While contemplating writing this review, I felt concerned that I might not be able to explain it, but really, I don’t have to explain it. Read it for yourself and draw your own conclusions.




































