This is an unusual book. Richard Feynman was a Nobel Prize-winning physicist known for his groundbreaking work in, among other things, quantum electrodynamics and nanotechnology; he assisted with the development of the atomic bomb in the Manhattan Project and was part of a panel that investigated the Challenger Space Shuttle tragedy. Mlodinow met Feynman at the California Institute of Technology soon after joining the Caltech faculty. At the time, he was unsure of what aspect of advanced physics to approach next after completing his graduate studies, and he looked to Feynman for advice and inspiration.
For me personally, some of the most obscure passages in the book are descriptions of what the various physicists in the book were working on, but these are relatively brief. Mlodinow’s emphasis is more on his search for relevance, for a mentor, and for something to pursue in such a high-energy intellectual environment. Feynman provides a key when he comments, while observing a rainbow, that he supposed that Descartes was inspired to come up with the mathematical analysis of rainbows because he thought rainbows were beautiful. Mlodinow asks Feynman “Do you think it would be wise to work on a theory that almost everyone else thinks is nonsense?” To which Feynman replies, “Only under one condition. That you don’t think it’s nonsense.” There are gems like this scattered throughout the book. For instance, Mlodinow states: “The goal of science may be to describe reality, but as long as science is carried out by human beings, human qualities will affect the description.” But that’s part of the fun. With the right attitude, discovering what lies behind the universe becomes a great adventure.
There is a somber thread running through the narrative too, though. By the time Mlodinow meets Feynman, the esteemed scientist has already been diagnosed with cancer and has undergone serious operations. At one touching moment, he weeps as he confesses to the author that he regrets that he might not be able to see his young daughter grow up. Mlodinow relates that he had his own brush with cancer too, around that time, when he was diagnosed with testicular cancer and confronted with the possibility of having surgery to remove his testicles. He writes that “death became the focus of my life.” This turned out to be a false diagnosis; he was pronounced cancer-free. However, it helped Mlodinow realize that he should take Feynman’s advice to heart and seek a direction that he himself believed was the right one. He says that “if there is one thing he taught me, it is the importance of being truly committed to whatever it is we are striving for.” In Mlodinow’s case, this included becoming a writer, an ambition for which he was derided by some of the scientists he worked with. After he left Caltech, he did, in fact, get into writing screenplays and teleplays, including episodes of Star Trek: The Next Generation.
My conclusion? This is a worthwhile read, although it may not please everyone. Despite its allusions to high-octane physics, it is deeply personal, deeply emotional, and deeply human. Hang in there through the descriptions of theories of physics, and you will discover a story of people striving to reach their goals despite seemingly overwhelming odds.




































